Bois =
01 ยง. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 100%
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480
~y
BAN
Docket No.NRO1663-14
9 October 2014
e to your application for correction to your naval
This ig in reierenc
10 United States Code, section
- record pursuant to the provisions of
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records,
ication on 7 October
sitting in executive session, considered your apP
2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the
advisory opinion Furnished by the Navy Personnel Command {NPC) letter
5420 PERS-836/074 of 11 Jun 2014, a copy of which was provided to you
on 26 Jun 2014, and is being provided to you now. Additionally, the
Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 20
September 2014.
The Board members also considered your request for a personal
however they found that the issues in the case were
adequately documented and that a personal appearance with or without
counsel would not materially add to the Board's understanding of the
issues involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has
been denied.
appearance,
-However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In making this determination, the Board concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence
not previously considered by the Board prior te making its decision in
s important to keep im tmind that a
to all official records.
correction of an official naval
to demonstrate the existence of
this case. In this regard, it i
presumption of regularity attaches
Consequently, when applying for a
record, the burden is on the applicant
probable material error or injustice.
Came
et le be
fo~ ff vo
inseyel yy
Vi fo
ROBERT J. ONEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6066 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 7220 Ser Wi30C/14U1348 dated 15 October 2014, a copy of which was sent to you on 18 October 2014; it was returned to sender on 5 November 2014. De Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3861 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4734 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6870 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) memo 1660 RCT of 6 May 2014, a COpy of which was previously provided to you on 27 May 2014, and which is now enclosed. ra correction of an official Consequently, when applying fo naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8235 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3788 13
a three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6132 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Docket No.NRO6132-14 ction of an official naval to demonstrate the existence of plying E6r a Serre record, the burden is on the applicant Consequently, when ap probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3560 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by CNO Memo 5400 Ser N133/463 of 17 Sep 13 and CNO Memo 5400 Ser N133/507 of 6 Nov 13, copies of which are attached and were previously furnished. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3337 14
COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3337-14 10 October 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9794 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, cogether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable SS SLaLUTEeSs, to addition, the Board considered the regulations and policies. New evidence 15 evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...